The Guadalupe Nipomo Dunes National Wildlife is presenting a Comprehensive Conservation Plan and its Environmental Assessment to the public with a comment period that ends on April 16. A public meeting will be held at the Ramona Garden Park Center in Grover Beach on March 22, 5:30-7:30.
The Refuge’s Draft Vision Statement is “To conserve the dynamic landscape and imperiled natural resources…” and “… we protect the Dunes Complex for everyone’s enjoyment…” and “…the service works cooperatively with other agencies, nonprofit organizations… .” The history is that the refuge has probably been successful in the protection of certain species, especially snowy plover, and CNPS serves on an advisory committee regarding weed abatement. Issues of public interaction have improved lately.
The plan cites three alternatives. Alternative A is “No Action” which would continue management as in the past. Alternative B increases actions to protect species, and increase interaction with the public. SpeciWic mention is made of protecting habitat for La Graciosa thistle and marsh sandwort, while directing foot trafWic away from plover nesting areas. Alternative C is rather troubling, as it “will take into consideration the forecasted decline in budgets for the NWRS, proposes to reduce or eliminate many of the current management activities occurring on the refuge, as well as close the refuge to all public access.” The clear interest of CNPS is support of Alternative B, but also to offer CNPS as a more active partner in conservation of the dune habitat. Alternative C must not happen as it would, among other things, shut CNPS out of the refuge and access to Coreopsis Hill. You can send comments to: PaciWic Southwest Region, Refuge Planning, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; 2800 Cottage Way, W+1832; Sacramento CA 95825
You can email comments to email@example.com including “Guadalupe-Nipomo Dunes CCP” in the subject line.
The 21st Annual Spring Outing Botanical Excursion Foray, Retreat, and Escape to the Environment Brought to you by the new Bryophyte Chapter of the California Native Plant Society!
Friday to Monday, March 18-21, 2016 North Coast Range near Occidental, California
Founded in 1996, SO BE FREE is a series of West Coast forays started by the Bryolab at UC Berkeley, but open to all botanists. The main focus is on bryophytes, but we also encourage experts on other groups to come along and smell the liverworts. We welcome specialists and generalists, professionals and amateurs, master bryologists and rank beginners.
SO BE FREE is held each spring, somewhere in the Western US, associated with spring break at universities. Evening slide shows and informal talks are presented as well as keying sessions with microscopes. In addition to seeing interesting wild areas and learning new plants, important goals for SO BE FREE include keeping West Coast bryologists (and friends) in touch with each other and teaching beginners.
To see pictures and information from past outings, visit the SO BE FREE website (http:// ucjeps.berkeley.edu/bryolab/Field_Trips.html).
Early Registration Deadline is Dec. 15, 2015. Regular registration Deadline is Feb. 19, 2016
Newsletter Editor and Hospitality Positions are Open! Our chapter is looking for a Newsletter Editor to produce our chapter newsletter, Obispoensis. If you like to write, edit and do a little page layout design, this position is perfect for you.
The newsletter is published eight times each year, monthly October through June except January. No previous experience is necessary. Contact Bob Hotaling, firstname.lastname@example.org or Bill Waycott, email@example.com.
The Hospitality committee arrives at meetings early to organize and set up refreshments. Contact Mardi Niles (805) 489-9274, firstname.lastname@example.org or Bill Waycott, email@example.com, (805) 459-2103.
If you have a list of native plants observed in a specific area (e.g., Morro Bay State Park) or along a trail (e.g., Hazard Peak Trail at Montaña de Oro), CNPS wants to receive a copy. CNPS member Madeline Fay has volunteered to review the lists and bring the taxonomy up to date using the latest scientific names. With permission, the corrected copies will be placed on the Chapter website. Please contact Madeline by e-mail at firstname.lastname@example.org, and she will be happy to work out the details with you. Thank you.
Conservation Committee Update
Margarita Area Specific Plan development area
When developers graded a population of Sanicula maritima without getting a permit from the California Dept. of Fish and Wildlife, the Department, the City of San Luis Obispo and CNPS were concerned. It turns out several populations sit in the Margarita Area Specific Plan development area, and the fate of the populations regarding mitigation is, at the time of writing, unclear. Whatever the outcome, our chapter will conduct a survey of the county to see if we can find any more populations of the plant and to assess the possibility of starting new populations. Bear in mind that CNPS has a long standing policy against mitigating losses by moving plants to other sites. Transplantation seldom works, and is not a valid mitigation for destroyed habitat in the Margarita Specific Plan. Gaining knowledge of the plant’s status and the most suitable habitats will better inform our response to this issue.
Land application of biosolids
County planners took a proposed revision of the ordinance on the land application of biosolids, the ‘nice’ term for the dried sludge coming from sewer plants. Planners wanted to start an EIR but a split Board declined as the interim ordinance seems to work and is good for another two years. Commenters stated that the proposed ordinance does not meet the requirements spelled out by the Board and a Sewage Sludge Land Application Task Force in 2002. CNPS has been concerned that sludge might be dumped on rangeland or agricultural marginal lands, thus changing nutrient balances and habitat, so we will be keeping an eye on the issue.
The carbon recycling issue is at the core of global warming issues, and warming was made evident by the current blooming of Chorizanthe populations on serpentine in eastern Montana de Oro Park. I hope the pollinators will be around to do their work.
Bonnie’s drawing for this issue of Obispoensis is based on a picture sent to me by George Butterworth. The species, Cucurbita palmata, has many common names. The ones I found on the web include coyote melon, coyote gourd, desert gourd, palmate-leafed gourd, coyote ear, buffalo gourd, stinking melon, calabazilla, or chilicote.
Coyote melon is primarily a desert species that grows best where there are summer monsoons. Since we are a little north of the summer monsoon track coyote melon is relatively rare in our area. However, a few plants can be found in the eastern edge of our Chapter area (i.e., Carrizo Plain and the upper Cuyama Valley). It’s a species that prefers sandy, disturbed soils where vegetation is scarce such as desert washes and dry, rocky slopes.
The most common name around here, coyote melon, refers to its vegetative resemblance to the pumpkin, squash cucumber, melon, or gourd, family Cucurbitaceae. The Cucurbitaceae are non-woody (herbaceous) vines with tendrils and broad, palmate-veined leaves. Flowers in coyote melon are unisexual (staminate or pistilate). In coyote melon they are large and yellow and borne solitarily in the in the axils of leaves. Fruits in the family are extremely variable and are considered unique to the family. Often it is a kind of quite large berry botanists call a pepo. Pepos have fleshy, fibrous, or watery flesh inside and usually are enclosed by a clearly defined outer skin or rind. When totally mature, they often dry out to a hollow dry spheroid.
From the list of common names for the family, I suspect it would be easy to conclude that the family produces a fair number of edible and otherwise useful cultivated species. The main economic species produce edible, fleshy fruit today. But this has not always been true and is certainly NOT true of coyote melon and most other wild members of the family today. The flesh of coyote melon is extremely bitter and if one is tempted to try to eat it, it would act as an extreme emetic. That is, it would rapidly be expelled from both ends.
So what’s the link between inedible and/or poisonous wild cucurbits of today with the edible cucurbits listed above? It is best summed up by a quote from a November 20, 2015 paper by A’ndrea Elyse Messer titled “Loss of Mastodons Aided Domestication of Pumpkins, Squash.” I actually heard (or read) about the article around Thanksgiving and decided to look it up on the Web. The quote that caught my interest was: If Pleistocene megafauna – mastodons, mammoths, giant sloths and others – had not become extinct, humans might not be eating pumpkin pie and squash for the holidays, according to an international team of anthropologists.
The article indicates that most wild cucurbits are bitter and that smaller organisms (and humans) tend to avoid trying to eat the fruit. It then notes that large mammals, such as the mastodon, have fewer bitter taste buds in their mouths so eating cucurbits shouldn’t have been a problem. The authors note that they could deduce that the mastodons were eating cucurbits because when and wherever they examined fossil mastodon dung it contained cucurbit seeds. Since the only way cucurbit seeds could get into dung is by being eaten, they concluded cucurbits were an important food source for them. Being huge animals, mastodons had to migrate over wide distances so they also concluded mastodons were major dispersers of cucurbit seeds. The researchers also found that the DNA they recovered from the seeds in the dung was more similar to wild cucurbits of today than to cultivated edible ones. Therefore it’s logical that the ancestors of the edible cucurbits were bitter.
What killed off the mastodons? A recent book titled, The Sixth Extinction, gives a possible clue. It turns out that large animals live in a very tight balance with their environment and the regular sustained loss of even a few key animals would lead to extinction in a relatively short time (a few thousand years). Early humans coexisted with the last of the mastodons. Early human hunters probably preferred to kill the biggest and healthiest animals as hunters still do today. This would mean they would have taken the breeding animals of a family or herd. When a parent is killed, often the rest of their family dies as well. So even with very modest losses of a few key animals a year, the book indicates it would lead to a slow extinction in a few thousand years.
Mastodons and the other large mammals died out over ten thousand years ago. So why do we have edible cucurbits today? The article indicates that early peoples didn’t use fresh cucurbit fruits for food, but waited until they were dry and hollow and used them for containers, noise makers (rattles) and/or fish floats. Although some species’ seeds (e.g., coyote melon) are edible when totally mature, at least some of their seeds would have ended up in their disturbed, highly nitrogenous trash heaps. So people took over from the mastodons as major seed dispersers. So cucurbits would have been become common around early human settlements. Since a bitter compound is often poisonous in large uncontrolled amounts, but medicinal in small, regulated amounts, it can be assumed that early peoples used fleshy immature fruits as medicine. It doesn’t seem to me to be a great stretch to assume enough genetic variability in early cucurbits so that some would have been less bitter. These would be selectively utilized by early people, probably the wives and mothers.
By the time the mastodons were gone, early peoples would have been planting various cucurbits around their settlements. Once there, they would have been selected to be less and less bitter until we have the edible squash and pumpkins we enjoy today. So next Thanksgiving, remember to thank the mastodons and other large extinct mammals for your pumpkin pie. One final thought, pumpkins and squash were domesticated in the new world and in all likely hood the jack-o-lantern pumpkin was one of the few major crops domesticated within the lower 48 states. Personally, I find coyote melon to be best (and safely) enjoyed as we find it, growing in nature.
Dr. Neil Havlik was recognized with the 2015 Hoover Award for his contributions to appreciation and preservation of the San Luis Obispo native flora. The honor, named for Dr. Robert Hoover, was presented to an appreciative Neil Havlik at the annual Banquet on January 23. Prior recipients meet yearly to select an honoree judged for their accomplishments in education, conservation and chapter support.
Dr. Havlik served as San Luis Obispo City Natural Resources Manager from 1996 until his retirement in 2012. In that role, he oversaw the creation of the city greenbelt. He was instrumental in the acquisition of key parcels, protection of other private parcels, the expansion of the greenbelt trail systems, and was the guiding force behind the joint publication
(with our chapter) of the immensely popular Wildflowers of San Luis Obispo guidebook. His role in protecting Chorro Creek bog thistle populations within the greenbelt led to a 2015 special award from the US Fish and Wildlife Service.
Neil majored in Biology at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, graduating cum laude in June 1968. At our banquet, Dr. Havlik recounted how honored he was to have studied under the late Robert Hoover. He then attended the graduate program in Botany at UC Santa Barbara from January 1969 to June 1971, earning a Master of Science degree in Botany. In 1978, Neil went back to school, seeking a Doctorate in the interdisciplinary Wildland Resource Science program at UC Berkeley. He earned his doctorate in that field in June 1984.
Havlik held a variety of positions with the East Bay Regional Park District in Oakland for fifteen years, involved in land use planning, environmental impact analysis and mitigation, natural resource management, property management, and land acquisition. In 1987 he became the first Executive Director for a non-profit land trust headquartered in Fairfield, California (Solano County in the lower Sacramento delta).
Since retirement, Dr. Havlik has contributed greatly to developing a local Carrizo Plains Conservancy initiative, a special purpose land trust targeted on bringing more property under protection in our Carrizo region. Neil Havlik also serves on the board of the Coastal San Luis Resources Conservation District. The RCD projects play an essential role in furthering preservation of our rural landscape, quietly enlisting landowners in vital protection projects.
Please share your appreciation of the Neil’s wonderful contributions to our county and its flowers.
California Native Plant Society –
San Luis Obispo Chapter
Annual Potluck Banquet
Saturday, January 23, 2016
$10 per person, plus a pot luck item for the dinner
Morro Bay Community Center
1001 Kennedy Way, Morro Bay
Social Hour – 5:30 pm
Buffet Style Potluck Dinner – 6:30 pm
Chapter business – 7:30 pm
Program: “Native Plants and Bees, and Beyond” – 8:00 pm
Program: Dr. Gordon Frankie
Our banquet speaker this year will be Dr. Gordon Frankie, Professor and Research Entomologist at the University of California, Berkeley. He’s co-author of California Bees and Blooms (http://ucanr.edu/blogs/blogcore/postdetail.cfm?postnum=15602). The book will be available for purchase and signing at the banquet.
|Tickets are $10 per person – You may reserve your spot with credit card or PayPal by clicking the Tickets button, or if you prefer, you may send payment to D. Krause, 2706 Newton Drive, Cambria, CA, 93428. Questions? Contact David Krause at email@example.com or 805-927-5182
Potluck suggestions: CNPS will be providing the beer, wine, coffee, tea, and assorted beverages included with the cost of the banquet. Plates, glasses, cups, and napkins will be available; we ask that you bring your own eating utensils, although plastic utensils will be available.
For the dinner potluck, we are asking those with last names beginning with the following letters to bring the suggested item (and serving utensils). However, if you have a dish you especially want to share with the group, please feel free to bring it or contact Lauren (805-460-6329, firstname.lastname@example.org) for alternative suggestions.
A to H: salad (with dressing) or side dish
I to Q: dessert
R to Z: main meat or veggie dish
Please put your name on a label or piece of tape on your serving items so they can be returned to you.
Driving Directions: Exit Hwy 1 at Morro Bay Boulevard. At the “roundabout” turn right onto Quintana Road, and left onto Kennedy Way (after Albertson’s). Go ½ block. Community Center is on the right.
If you have any questions, please contact Lauren at email@example.com, or 805-460-6329.
The CNPS monthly meeting Thursday, December 3 at the San Luis Obispo Veterans Hall will kick off with a workshop from 6:10 to 7:00 pm on bryophyte identiﬁcation led by Dr. Ben Carter.
Our county is very rich in these often-overlooked little plants, and this will be a chance for you to learn their distinctive features. Ben plans to cover differences among mosses, liverworts, and hornworts, important characters of their gametophytes and sporophytes, and provide ﬁeld characters for identifying several of the most commonly encountered genera in SLO County. We’ll have a few microscopes, but bring your hand lenses!
View this event on our Event Calendar
Image By Bob Blaylock (Own work) [CC BY-SA 4.0], via Wikimedia Commons
Errata and Jespon updates
For those of you who own our chapter published book, Dune Mother’s Wildﬂower Guide, you will want an Errata and New Nomenclature Conforming to the 2nd edition of The Jepson Manual.
Our excellent botanist member, Lauren Brown, took time this past summer to do this information update.
You can download the Errata here, or email me and I will forward a copy to you. firstname.lastname@example.org
– Linda Chipping
Errata and New Nomenclature Conforming to the 2nd edition of The Jepson Manual is also available for Wildflowers of the Carrizo Plain and Wildflowers of Highway 58.
CNPS is Hiring an Associate Director
As you may have heard, CNPS is hiring an Associate Director. Please help us get the word out to ﬁnd someone special who will help continue the great momentum we’ve built. Due to the great response so far, the hiring committee will begin reviewing applications early this month, so potential candidates should apply as soon as possible.
The Associate Director (AD) is a new leadership position. Under the direction of the Executive Director, the AD manages and enhances internal organization processes and infrastructure to ensure smooth and seamless operations that support CNPS’s ability to fulfill its mission. In the absence of the Executive Director, the AD assumes responsibility for directing the day to day operations of CNPS.
The AD provides key strategic leadership to the Executive Director (ED) by advising on issues of significant organizational importance and long-term sustainability. The AD is responsible for overseeing and monitoring financial practices, leading the budgeting process, managing human resources, and providing oversight of facilities and IT infrastructure. They will have broad latitude to shape this growing organization, including defining strategy and scoping/hiring new positions to help fulfill these important responsibilities. For the right person, one who sees how Californians can work together to celebrate and save our flora, this is a rare opportunity to make an enduring difference.
View the full job announcement here in a new tab.
Conservation Committee Update
November was quiet as far as specific projects up for CNPS review, but there are several conservation issues growing in the background that will require our wary eye.
Price Canyon Trail (Proposed)
I attended and gave input to a scoping meeting for a proposed trail through Price Canyon from Edna to Pismo Beach. This will be a section of the bi-state Anza Trail, and would have to pass through the Arroyo Grande Oil Field. I commented against sections of trail that went through relatively undisturbed oak woodland and the habitat of Pismo clarkia rather than staying in areas that are currently disturbed. I find that there is a conflict between potential trail users wanting a pleasant “nature experience” and the need of nature to avoid the “human experience” as much as possible. The SLO Council of Governments are taking the lead, and at this time there is no money for any trail development and right-of-way issues are significant.
It is possible that the rampant development that has destroyed much of the older dune surfaces of the Nipomo Mesa might slow, due to newly revealed issues associated with water supply. The Northern Cities Management Area (basically the Five Cities minus Avila) are challenging Nipomo CSD’s continued issuance of building permits on the basis that the CSD is intercepting groundwater that would normally percolate from the Santa Maria valley toward the NCMA. Recently water tables in the area are dropping to the extent that sea water intrusion is a distinct possibility.
Veldt Grass Impact
A circa 1970 photo of the Nipomo Mesa oil refinery reveals the eucalyptus groves since removed for the Woodlands Development and the once vibrant dune scrub community seen above and below the tank farm. The area above the tank farm was the pride of the ‘Dune Mother’, Kathleen Goddard Jones, who called it Wild Almond Meadows. Dark dune shrubs cover the land in 1970 (left), almost vanished in the Google Earth 2013 image (right) due to competition with veldt grass and attempts to control it using livestock.
The following is an article from February 1993. It was chosen by the editor to spare me the choice since Bonnie and I were away in late October. We totally agree with his choice; we had totally forgotten about it. The repeat of this article reminds me that many species of oaks have been producing fewer and fewer offspring primarily due to habitat modiﬁcation and outright habitat loss. They are also probably being impacted by rising temperatures due to global climate change. It is also important to remember that oaks have been extremely important in the history of the human race. Various oak species have provided food, cork, charcoal, and lumber. A few species still do.
Dried Leaf Retention in Black Oaks
The idea for the cover was hatched out of a statement made by Bonnie while we were traveling to Yosemite Valley just before Christmas. She remarked that the dry, brown leaves and black trucks of the Sierra black oak (Quercus kelloggii) made a beautiful counterpoint to the white snow. This got me to thinking about the advantages that might accrue to a tree to keep its old, dead, dry leaves until spring of the following year. I had noticed this same phenomenon ﬁrst in the eastern black oak of my youth in Illinois (Quercus nigra). Two ideas came readily to mind. First, it might provide some advantage to the plant that would aid its survival in the Montane Mixed Coniferous Forest where the Sierra black oak most often occurs. Some herbaceous plants produce hard leaves (e.g., bracken fern, Pteridium aquilinum) that last through the winter; these have been shown to shade out seedlings of competing plants during early spring growth. Last season’s bracken leaves begin to break down shortly after the new, young shoots get a foot or so tall. However, it is hard for me to accept a similar explanation to account for trees retaining dead leaves. I can think of a number of disadvantages such as increasing wind resistance and holding more snow on the branches. Both should result in more broken branches.
Retaining dead leaves could merely be an artifact of its history. Its closest relatives are all evergreen oaks and include the island scrub oak (Q. parvula) and the coast and interior live oaks (Q. agrifolia and Q. wislizeni). This group of oaks is called the red or black oak group (Erythrobalanus) and differs from the other major group, the white oaks (Lepidobalanus), primarily by having the leaf veins extending beyond the margin of the leaf as fairly heavy, tawny bristles or spines, possessing dark gray to blackish smooth bark, having thin ﬂat acorn scales, generally taking two years to mature their acorn (exception the coast live oak) and having reddish-brown wood.
A third group of oaks is also found in California and these possess characters in combinations not found in the two major groups. All three groups include species of evergreen and deciduous oaks, but, as far as I know, only the deciduous black oaks retain many of their dead leaves for so long a time period.
Could it merely be a trait indicating a relatively recent origin of deciduous habit from the more general evergreen habit of the group? If my memory serves me right, both eastern and Sierran black oak leaves seem thicker and more leathery than one would expect for a deciduous tree.
What about the advantage of ﬂowering trees and shrubs from evergreen habit? Primarily it is due to the fact that the off season (cold and/or dry) is not always so cold and/ or dry as to preclude a leaf from functioning. There are short periods, even in the most severe of seasons, when conditions are favorable for metabolism and growth. Evergreen plants can take advantage of these short periods because their leaves are in place, whereas deciduous trees must forgo them since, by the time they could produce new leaves, the favorable period would have been long gone.
Of course, evergreen plants must pay the cost of maintaining and protecting these living leaves during times when conditions prevent them from functioning, a cost not required of deciduous trees and shrubs. In other words, whether a ﬂowering tree or shrub is evergreen or deciduous depends on the balance between cost of maintaining non-functional leaves versus the gain from being able to take advantage of short periods of moderate conditions. Thus, evergreen ﬂowering trees and shrubs tend toward coastal and/or low to mid elevations where severe conditions tend to be rare and of short duration. Evergreen conifers, on the other hand, are a different story which will have wait for another time.
Dirk Walters Illustration by Bonnie Walter
Great News! Fall is here and the rains have ﬁnally started. There are so many things we could discuss this month but I would like to focus on how to prepare for what could be a very wet winter.
Manage erosion on slopes
Covering slopes with mulch would be a good idea. There are basically two types of mulch out there. Some let rain water penetrate such as fresh tree chips, recycled wood chips, and walk on bark. Other mulches such as gorilla hair or cedar bark, hold water tightly and do not allow it to penetrate, hence stopping soil erosion. Just remember, if you have plants on a steep slope, remove gorilla hair two feet from around the plants’ trunks. This will allow rainwater to penetrate the area and water the plants’ roots. If your plans are to suppress weed growth on a level area, apply any other mulch four inches thick. It is not necessary to use gorilla hair. Remember to keep chips one foot away from trucks to prevent root rot.
Control water molds and root fungi
There’s a higher likelihood of having water borne pathogens affect drought-stricken plants during rainy months. These pathogens are easily spread by excess water so it’s important to remember that pooling water can spread a pathogen from a sick plant to a healthy one. If you have any plants that appear to be dying from drought stress, you would be wise to not allow water to run or pool there. Come spring, if the plant appears to be completely dead remove it immediately. If green growth appears, wait and see if it recovers.
Prune for high winds
Winter storms usually bring quite a bit of wind. A tree’s or shrub’s branches must allow the wind to pass threw or it will blow over. If you have any plants in need of thinning, fall is a great time . The nights have gotten cooler and plants are starting to go dormant. Consult gardening books for tips on how to thin your trees and shrubs. The goal is to allow wind to penetrate and blow threw the branches without destroying the general shape of your tree or shrub.
From Suzette and me, thanks to all of you who came and volunteered at this year’s plant sale. We had a great time and we really appreciated your help. Until I see you at our next meeting, Happy Gardening!
Image By Jason Hollinger (Lace Lichen Uploaded by Amada44) [CC BY 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons
On July 15, 2015, Governor Jerry Brown signed the bill designating lace lichen, Ramalina menziesii, the California State Lichen.
The law takes effect January 1, 2016, making California the first state to recognize a lichen as a state symbol. Lace lichen joins the California poppy as the state flower and the grizzly bear as the state animal.
The California Lichen Society promotes the appreciation, conservation, and study of California lichens, and has posted a beautiful article about our new state lichen on their website: http://californialichens.org/state-lichen/
CALS sees this designation as an important step in increasing public awareness of the significant roles that lichens play in our natural environment. Calling attention to lichens by recognizing one of them as the California State Lichen creates an opportunity for us to learn about and celebrate the things that make California special.
We Encourage Your Input at our Next Board Meeting
The Board of Directors of the CNPS San Luis Obispo Chapter will hold its bi-monthly meeting on November 19th, 2015 from 6:00 to 7:30 pm.
This meeting is held in the Pavilion at the San Luis Obispo Botanical Garden, 3450 Dairy Creek Rd, SLO (located in Choro Regional Park across Hwy 1 from Cuesta College).
CNPS members are encouraged to attend the meeting to observe discussions and give input.